Re: F-150 or F-250?

Lem Evans on December 29th 2011, 9:30 pm

D's557BBF wrote:I know for fact that Rob's truck will out do the 6.2 in EVERYTHING but 1/4 dead stop no trailer racing. and Rob's truck will get 17-22 MPG Vs 12-16

They killed the power on the 6.2 four years ago. It was going to be a cylinder deactivation engine but some big shot killed those plans and the ECO Boost was born! The new 6.2 is going to make this one look like a 4 banger lol!!

Mr. Bowles was racing the phototype engine years before it was released as the 6.2 for the F-series.........come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it. Smile

D's557BBF on December 29th 2011, 9:39 pm

Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!! Twisted Evil

Lem Evans on December 29th 2011, 9:40 pm

D's557BBF wrote:
Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

A new 7.3? I thought they quit making those?

the Coug on December 29th 2011, 9:52 pm

Lem Evans wrote:
D's557BBF wrote:
Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

A new 7.3? I thought they quit making those?

yeah I wish they did still make them

Lem do the new trucks have a PISS tank like the new Chevies for the Exhaust?

schmitty on December 29th 2011, 9:54 pm

Yep Coug, they do have the urea tank. Cool

Lem Evans on December 29th 2011, 9:58 pm

the Coug wrote:
Lem Evans wrote:
D's557BBF wrote:
Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

A new 7.3? I thought they quit making those?

yeah I wish they did still make them

Lem do the new trucks have a PISS tank like the new Chevies for the Exhaust?

6.2 aint got but one tank......and I wish they still made '66 Mustang convertables Very Happy

the Coug on December 29th 2011, 9:58 pm

Well that counts me out of owning one then Shocked

or if I do it will be Freakin removed and Shyt canned, I ain't payin $12 bucks a gallon for Piss to put in a truck....

bruno on December 30th 2011, 10:27 am

the Coug wrote:Well that counts me out of owning one then or if I do it will be Freakin removed and Shyt canned, I ain't payin $12 bucks a gallon for Piss to put in a truck....

lol....... damn you bitch about everything .....its for the envirorment alien

bruno on December 30th 2011, 10:28 am

richter69 wrote:bring the 6.7 down Rob and let me get some tunes for it and get rid of the throttle stop exhaust system..................should even things up a bit.........

foot brake this beast in 4wh and let her eat ......... faster then a coyote Twisted Evil

richter69 on December 30th 2011, 10:45 am

put it in 4wd low and it will out 60' your mustang................... Razz

Curt on December 30th 2011, 10:48 am

Lem Evans wrote:

6.2 aint got but one tank......and I wish they still made '66 Mustang convertables

I'd be much happier with a new '69 Mach I. I love you

dfree383 on December 30th 2011, 10:52 am

Casual Towing towing under 10k and everyday using the truck around town..... Get the 6.2 Gas Engine, Towing for REAL and using a truck for real work.... Get the Diesel. Diesels need to be worked and used if you don;t they are nothing but trouble.

richter69 on December 30th 2011, 12:51 pm

dfree383 wrote:Diesels need to be worked and used if you don;t they are nothing but trouble.

This is a false statement, the problems we see are in no way related to how one is used, how they are maintained can have some bearing as well as abuse, most of it though is just from poor design to begin with. EPA restrictions also plays a big role.