Re: 55* 50* vs 45* valve angles

bruno on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 10:08

Tennessee Bullitt wrote:
605FOX wrote:Bruno , you do too much reading ....just increase the comp and get a real cam ....and let the damn thing eat

Funny I was told this at the seminar.

i have no doubt .......

richter69 on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 13:59

What are the cam specs?

bruno on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 14:39

richter69 wrote:What are the cam specs?

you would have to ask Lem for that info

richter69 on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 14:48

Seems like he told me and I domt remember it being that small. Honestly the cam is right for the combo, head type used etc. You gotta remember those eddys aint exactly at the top of the pecking order. Your shit runs damn good for what parts were used.

bruno on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 15:14

richter69 wrote:Seems like he told me and I domt remember it being that small. Honestly the cam is right for the combo, head type used etc. You gotta remember those eddys aint exactly at the top of the pecking order. Your shit runs damn good for what parts were used.

sir i never said anything about small or not running good ........

IDT-572 on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 17:23

bruno wrote:
richter69 wrote:Seems like he told me and I domt remember it being that small. Honestly the cam is right for the combo, head type used etc. You gotta remember those eddys aint exactly at the top of the pecking order. Your shit runs damn good for what parts were used.

sir i never said anything about small or not running good ........

He said you were small.................(' Razz

')('

')

bigblok2000ranger on Tue 31 Jan 2012 - 21:02

bruno wrote:
605FOX wrote:Bruno , you do too much reading ....just increase the comp and get a real cam ....and let the damn thing eat

I was just being inqusitive .......

Nothing wrong with that! Very Happy