Not too shabby ....

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Not too shabby ....

Post  JACKAZZFLATZ on April 3rd 2016, 9:48 am

Big thankx to RMCompetition for the head work and cam design.  
My 557 SCJA head made 751 Hp @ 6000, and 726 Tq @ 4900 on Baker Engineering's dyno Friday.
First ever dyno session for me. Kudos to TJ and Co. @ Baker also.
avatar
JACKAZZFLATZ

Posts : 231
Join date : 2009-11-24
Location : N/W MICHIGAN

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  Moodyblues on April 3rd 2016, 9:34 pm

Nice!
avatar
Moodyblues

Posts : 1139
Join date : 2009-08-19
Age : 57
Location : Jasper, TN

View user profile http://www.russhoodinsurance.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  J.Toney on April 3rd 2016, 9:47 pm

Smile
avatar
J.Toney

Posts : 315
Join date : 2009-08-18
Location : Kent CIty, MI

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  biglucky on April 4th 2016, 10:34 am

You had better tighten up those sticks on the back.
avatar
biglucky

Posts : 166
Join date : 2012-11-04
Age : 59
Location : Shepherdsville, ky

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  Dave De on April 4th 2016, 12:42 pm

That Randy knows a thing or two.
Was that a chassis dyno?
avatar
Dave De

Posts : 471
Join date : 2011-05-27
Location : Utica, MI

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  rmcomprandy on April 6th 2016, 12:24 am

Dave De wrote:That Randy knows a thing or two.
Was that a chassis dyno?

Baker Engineering, sometimes known as Pro/Cam racing engine components, has had an engine dynomometer for at least 30 years.  I think it is a Stuska with a DePac acquisition system.
They build and maintain quite a few Oval track race engines there.

I think they may have added a chassis dyno, also.

rmcomprandy

Posts : 4668
Join date : 2008-12-02
Location : Roseville, Michigan

View user profile http://www.rmcompetition.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  paperman on April 8th 2016, 4:45 pm

From the pics of it it looks like a dinosaur dyno. Is it common to pull an engine down in place of ramping up in RPM? Seems they go to full RPM then pull it down.

Their chassis dyno was a nice set-up. I was there when it was first installed and was a bit hard to get a good read on a front drive turbo car with a FMIC. They weren't set-up to give me any cooling.

paperman

Posts : 83
Join date : 2009-11-29
Age : 37
Location : MI

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  Lem Evans on April 8th 2016, 5:44 pm

Cool

Lem Evans

Posts : 6828
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

View user profile http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  rmcomprandy on April 8th 2016, 9:24 pm

paperman wrote:  Is it common to pull an engine down in place of ramping up in RPM?  Seems they go to full RPM then pull it down.

 

With a Stuska dyno and DePac data acquisition system you can go up or down in the RPM range when testing an engine; whichever you wish. Pulling it down against the absorber for a test will usually emit a bit higher torque number, unless it is step tested.

rmcomprandy

Posts : 4668
Join date : 2008-12-02
Location : Roseville, Michigan

View user profile http://www.rmcompetition.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Not too shabby ....

Post  rmcomprandy on May 2nd 2016, 10:35 am

JACKAZZFLATZ wrote:Big thankx to RMCompetition for the head work and cam design.  
My 557 SCJA head made 751 Hp @ 6000, and 726 Tq @ 4900 on Baker Engineering's dyno Friday.
First ever dyno session for me.  Kudos to TJ and Co. @ Baker also.  

I look forward to seeing you at the Memorial Shootout in early June.

rmcomprandy

Posts : 4668
Join date : 2008-12-02
Location : Roseville, Michigan

View user profile http://www.rmcompetition.com

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum