IDT porn now with flow #'s!

cool40 wrote:i like everyone's opinion as well,you never know what may help you out with the subject at hand.i have an idea! sometime,somewhere,some of you guys f=v(ken up this thred could get together with a shaft setup and a stud setup and a dyno and see who's got the edge.if yall still cant work it out,use the shaft set to take a swing at somebody and the guy's with the stud mounts can throw them at the other guy's and that should make a dam good use of both of them!however if one were to throw a set of shaft's it realy wouldnt be a fair test but you'd only get 2 chances at the guy with 16 rockers so we still may not be able to get a real A/B answers.

schmitty wrote:Kinda come down to this, run what you want to run, it's your money do with it as you want. I would say that Randy has probably dealt with more high end engines than any of us here and if he were to suggest something to me I would definately be all ears and not be questioning his opinions. You can call me names or demean me in any way you desire, but I know where to get good solid advice and I for one appreciate his being here and helping us out.[/quote;
---------

schmitty , please reread all my post on this thread, im not questioning andys thoughts, only what there based on. ive already said i know he cant aford the shafts, im explaining that for what this head can do there better,hands down over 8000 rpm,and the ratios are another benefit to some engines,even with smaller cams. we dont race dyno,or flow benches, so we test in the real world,this gives us real data to go by.to learn,and or to include on the next engine done.


on page 2 people starting to tell him about shafts,lem thought there was noone making a good set, that when i started telling him about jessel it went from there. the rest of them quit typing, or quit helping. mmmmmmm


-rich