Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
+4
83-88T-Bird Guy
whatbumper
Tennessee Bullitt
96Mustang460cid
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
For a large bore, large cubic street driven turbo application, would you guys recommend 8.5:1 or 9.5:1. This is going in a 4,800 lb truck.
A few of my thoughts:
1) The large cid will help with low end torque
2) The higher compression will increase cylinder pressure and may encourage detonation. A well designed camshaft should fix that, though, right?
3) Higher efficiency
4) Bigger engine will utilize as-cast A460 cylinder heads at a lower RPM better.
5) ???
6) ???
Combo:
-- 4.5" bore
-- 4.3" (547 cid) or 4.4" stroke (560 cid)
-- A460 cylinder heads (as cast)
-- < 7,000 rpm
-- Custom camshaft designed around application
-- mid-mount 98mm turbo (< 15 psig)
-- C6 trans w/ ~3,000 stall
-- Carb'd
-- Belt driven A/C, P/S, alternator, and fuel pump
-- ~5,000 miles/year (hopefully)
-- 1,000+ hp
-- Pump gas (91+ octane)
I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on the matter .
Have a good day!
Michael
Edit: One more downside: bigger cid will bring the hp potential of the turbo down a little further. I believe this turbo is getting close to too small already...
A few of my thoughts:
1) The large cid will help with low end torque
2) The higher compression will increase cylinder pressure and may encourage detonation. A well designed camshaft should fix that, though, right?
3) Higher efficiency
4) Bigger engine will utilize as-cast A460 cylinder heads at a lower RPM better.
5) ???
6) ???
Combo:
-- 4.5" bore
-- 4.3" (547 cid) or 4.4" stroke (560 cid)
-- A460 cylinder heads (as cast)
-- < 7,000 rpm
-- Custom camshaft designed around application
-- mid-mount 98mm turbo (< 15 psig)
-- C6 trans w/ ~3,000 stall
-- Carb'd
-- Belt driven A/C, P/S, alternator, and fuel pump
-- ~5,000 miles/year (hopefully)
-- 1,000+ hp
-- Pump gas (91+ octane)
I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on the matter .
Have a good day!
Michael
Edit: One more downside: bigger cid will bring the hp potential of the turbo down a little further. I believe this turbo is getting close to too small already...
Last edited by 96Mustang460cid on September 22nd 2010, 10:38 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Adding information)
96Mustang460cid- Posts : 154
Join date : 2009-07-11
Location : Tulsa, OK
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
why not do a roots or twin screw with that much weight? I have seen 400 cid small blocks in cars have to much fun when the big turbo hits. It almost seems that much weight would like more hard hitting TQ. Or twins might be better for that idea. P51 heads might be more user friendly for the street or runnig A460 heads would be great for a n/a 600+ cubes.
Tennessee Bullitt- Posts : 582
Join date : 2009-08-25
Location : Ft Knox
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
8.5:1 CR and the smaller cubic inch
You're going to run out of turbo a long time before the 7000rpm number.
I still have the 101 for sale if you need it. just put your hot side on it and sell the 98.
You're going to run out of turbo a long time before the 7000rpm number.
I still have the 101 for sale if you need it. just put your hot side on it and sell the 98.
whatbumper- Posts : 3024
Join date : 2009-11-11
Age : 43
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
Tennessee Bullitt wrote:why not do a roots or twin screw with that much weight? I have seen 400 cid small blocks in cars have to much fun when the big turbo hits. It almost seems that much weight would like more hard hitting TQ. Or twins might be better for that idea. P51 heads might be more user friendly for the street or runnig A460 heads would be great for a n/a 600+ cubes.
I'm more familiar with turbo stuff and I think a roots might damage the sleeper persona I'm looking for . I agree with you...my original build plan was 600+ cid N/A. That's why I bought the A460 heads and IDT block. Now that I've got it, though, I would lose money by trying to switch to P51 heads. I've already bought pistons, intake, fabricated headers, ect. I like the added security of 18 head bolts, though. I know I'm using the A460 stuff outside of its intended range, but I think it'll work okay still. One of the good things about non-N/A stuff is I can add boost if I want more power. If I ever want to really step this engine combo up, I'll swap camshafts and turbo(s) and be ready to roll some big'er' hp #'s.
whatbumper wrote:8.5:1 CR and the smaller cubic inch
You're going to run out of turbo a long time before the 7000rpm number.
I still have the 101 for sale if you need it. just put your hot side on it and sell the 98.
You're probably right..the 98 is too small. If/when I step up to a larger turbo, it'll likely be a 106mm .
Thanks for you input, guys!
Have a good day!
Michael
96Mustang460cid- Posts : 154
Join date : 2009-07-11
Location : Tulsa, OK
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
I have one still! Precision 106mm g trim $1400 plus shipping. or I will be at Tulsa on October 16th for the OTT5 race. you just have to swap your bigger exhaust side on it.
Let me know. It would be a bad ass ride then for sure!
Let me know. It would be a bad ass ride then for sure!
whatbumper- Posts : 3024
Join date : 2009-11-11
Age : 43
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
Cool, if you already have parts then turn it loose. The big turbo like the 106 you are talking will scream. I thought you didn't have any parts yet. Hell if the big turbo is a little lazy then spray a little HeRo juice on it to wake it up on the street
Tennessee Bullitt- Posts : 582
Join date : 2009-08-25
Location : Ft Knox
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
Tennessee Bullitt wrote:Cool, if you already have parts then turn it loose. The big turbo like the 106 you are talking will scream. I thought you didn't have any parts yet. Hell if the big turbo is a little lazy then spray a little HeRo juice on it to wake it up on the street
it won't be lazy with that many cubes.
whatbumper- Posts : 3024
Join date : 2009-11-11
Age : 43
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
With all those cubes and head flow , I would go with 8.5 to 1.
83-88T-Bird Guy- Posts : 1003
Join date : 2008-12-03
Age : 109
Location : Bardstown, KY
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
96Mustang460cid wrote: I know I'm using the A460 stuff outside of its intended range, but I think it'll work okay still.
I think the A460 18 bolt heads would be a great turbo head! 18 head bolts, great flow numbers and one of the biggest CC chambers for a BBF head, wheres the down side?
Filucky- Posts : 60
Join date : 2010-04-25
Age : 50
Location : Granbury, TX
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
Filucky wrote:96Mustang460cid wrote: I know I'm using the A460 stuff outside of its intended range, but I think it'll work okay still.
I think the A460 18 bolt heads would be a great turbo head! 18 head bolts, great flow numbers and one of the biggest CC chambers for a BBF head, wheres the down side?
the 18 bolt stuff has smaller chambers than the 10 bolt heads.
dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 14774
Join date : 2009-07-09
Location : Home Wif Da Wife.....
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
Stay at 8.5:1 for 91 octane.
Outlaw5.0- Posts : 122
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Canton, MI
Re: Compression Ratio: 8.5:1 vs. 9.5:1
I ran 10.8 on E85 in the 502". The new motor is a little bit less but is getting more boost.
EVE- Posts : 124
Join date : 2009-09-11
Similar topics
» Budget 466 build, hp guesstimate.
» Head/piston question
» What does the chamber tell you?
» Compression ratio?
» compression ratio ???? 460
» Head/piston question
» What does the chamber tell you?
» Compression ratio?
» compression ratio ???? 460
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|