cylinder head flow vs cam lift

View previous topic View next topic Go down

cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  Tennessee Bullitt on February 10th 2011, 9:56 am

I am staring to gather more info since I am getting into trying to understand cams a lot more. Lets say a cylinder head flows it's peak at .600 lift and you put a cam that yelds a .700 lift with the rockers. How much degrading will it do to performance? Does it really start to slow the air on the intake? What would it do to the exhaust? I have researched and all I come up with is high flowing heads with small camshafts.

Tennessee Bullitt

Posts: 524
Join date: 2009-08-25
Location: Ft Knox

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  dfree383 on February 10th 2011, 9:58 am

it will not degrade performance.

dfree383
BBF CONTRIBUTOR
BBF CONTRIBUTOR

Posts: 6736
Join date: 2009-07-09
Location: Everywhere

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  rmcomprandy on February 10th 2011, 10:00 am

dfree383 wrote:it will not degrade performance.


X2 ... you can overlift the valve past the point of max flow about 15% and still make gains. After that point, it may stay the same or hurt a little.

rmcomprandy

Posts: 1875
Join date: 2008-12-02
Location: Roseville, Michigan

View user profile http://www.rmcompetition.com

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  Tennessee Bullitt on February 10th 2011, 10:01 am

Hows that? So I would benifit from having more lift than where my heads peak on air flow? I am not knocking you Dave I am trying to fully understand this.

Tennessee Bullitt

Posts: 524
Join date: 2009-08-25
Location: Ft Knox

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  Tennessee Bullitt on February 10th 2011, 10:02 am

Gotcha Randy.

Tennessee Bullitt

Posts: 524
Join date: 2009-08-25
Location: Ft Knox

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  rmcomprandy on February 10th 2011, 10:06 am

Not Dave but, it's simply about the amount of time the valve will spend at the point of maximum flow; (unless the whole combination is not matched and "out to lunch").

rmcomprandy

Posts: 1875
Join date: 2008-12-02
Location: Roseville, Michigan

View user profile http://www.rmcompetition.com

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  dfree383 on February 10th 2011, 10:07 am

Tennessee Bullitt wrote:Hows that? So I would benifit from having more lift than where my heads peak on air flow? I am not knocking you Dave I am trying to fully understand this.


Flow data typicaly is on a dry bench with only 28" and with no charge movement... a running engine is way Different than a bench. Thier is alot more going on then a steady flow.

dfree383
BBF CONTRIBUTOR
BBF CONTRIBUTOR

Posts: 6736
Join date: 2009-07-09
Location: Everywhere

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  dfree383 on February 10th 2011, 10:09 am

rmcomprandy wrote:Not Dave but, it's simply about the amount of time the valve will spend at the point of maximum flow; (unless the whole combination is not matched and "out to lunch").


and alot depends on the head itself allong with the operating peramiters of the engine. Super stock engines are a good example...... they lift the valve way past the typical peak flow..... and the cars go faster....

dfree383
BBF CONTRIBUTOR
BBF CONTRIBUTOR

Posts: 6736
Join date: 2009-07-09
Location: Everywhere

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  Outlaw5.0 on February 10th 2011, 12:59 pm

Average flow. If you lift the valve slightly passed .600 lift, you stay in the peak flow area longer.

Outlaw5.0

Posts: 110
Join date: 2009-08-07
Location: Canton, MI

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  Tennessee Bullitt on February 10th 2011, 2:01 pm

Thanks for all the info guys. Now I can keep notes and records on what is what. I love learning and it is also great to have inteligent people who teach others.

Tennessee Bullitt

Posts: 524
Join date: 2009-08-25
Location: Ft Knox

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  Bret Powell on February 12th 2011, 9:25 am

Also keep in mind most people do not flow heads with the intake attached. So if a given head peaks at .600, it will likely not stall as low with the intake attached simply because the intake will probably cut the flow by a fair margine. In other words the intake will reduce the overall flow at the same .600. I've seen heads that stall at given lifts, not stall for another .050 or more lift with the intake attached. Add that to what the others said about what the engine sees and maybe this will help you understand.

Bret

Bret Powell

Posts: 53
Join date: 2009-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: cylinder head flow vs cam lift

Post  kjett on February 14th 2011, 9:58 pm

I'm far from being any sort of expert on this, but I can tell you real world that flow bench numbers are great to get you going but dyno tuning is where you see real results! My little 466 with Freelander ported D0VE-C heads peaked out on the bench at .700 I 327/E 186 and my cam is a solid roller 110lsa 268/277 @ .050 750/760 lift. When we put it on the dyno, the last pull peaked the tqe at 529.3@5200 dropped a point then came back up to peak again at 530.2@6000. So knowing that my cam opens way more than where my peak flow numbers are, it doesn't hurt at all! BTW, the pill was set at 7500 on the dyno on the stock crank. Shocked

Long story short, if these guys say don't sweat the flow bench numbers, listen to them! Very Happy


kjett

Posts: 526
Join date: 2009-09-14
Location: Virginia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum