Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
Page 1 of 2 • Share •
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
I have a Weiand Stealth CJ intake that I bought with intentions of building a 521 to put it on. Well, plans have changed and I am currently working on a 1972 429 with ported C9's on it. Going to put a Comp 34-239-4 cam in it with a 750 Edelbrock carb and L&L fenderwell exit headers. This is going in a 1978 F150 4x4 with a NP435 4speed, 4.88 gears and 36" tires. Will the CJ Stealth work ok with this or would I be better off with a standard Stealth or Performer RPM? Thank you for any recommendations.
Steve
Steve
velcro7279- Posts: 8
Join date: 2011-02-21
Location: Grayling, MI
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
Performer rpm maybe a Torquer

IDT-572- BBF CONTRIBUTOR

- Posts: 2644
Join date: 2008-12-02
Age: 51
Location: Shelbyville Tn.
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
Anybody know how much performance difference there is between a standard RPM and a standard Stealth manifold? There is a $50 difference in them and wondering if there is a $50 performance difference, too.
Steve
Steve
velcro7279- Posts: 8
Join date: 2011-02-21
Location: Grayling, MI
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
velcro7279 wrote:Anybody know how much performance difference there is between a standard RPM and a standard Stealth manifold? There is a $50 difference in them and wondering if there is a $50 performance difference, too.
Steve
If your major worry is performance versus money spent then you should find a cast iron 4 barrel manifold somewhere.
rmcomprandy- Posts: 1885
Join date: 2008-12-02
Location: Roseville, Michigan

Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
rmcomprandy wrote:velcro7279 wrote:Anybody know how much performance difference there is between a standard RPM and a standard Stealth manifold? There is a $50 difference in them and wondering if there is a $50 performance difference, too.
Steve
If your major worry is performance versus money spent then you should find a cast iron 4 barrel manifold somewhere.
There is a cast iron 4 bbl on the engine right now. I was going to use it but figured a Stealth or RPM would be better with the ported heads and the cam. Would I be giving up much using the iron over a Stealth or RPM?
Steve
velcro7279- Posts: 8
Join date: 2011-02-21
Location: Grayling, MI
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
velcro7279 wrote:rmcomprandy wrote:velcro7279 wrote:Anybody know how much performance difference there is between a standard RPM and a standard Stealth manifold? There is a $50 difference in them and wondering if there is a $50 performance difference, too.
Steve
If your major worry is performance versus money spent then you should find a cast iron 4 barrel manifold somewhere.
There is a cast iron 4 bbl on the engine right now. I was going to use it but figured a Stealth or RPM would be better with the ported heads and the cam. Would I be giving up much using the iron over a Stealth or RPM?
Steve
You questioned "performance per dollar spent" ... not about power totals as that seemed not to be most important in your equasion.
The iron manifold WILL give you the most performance per dollar spent; whether any other manifold is WORTH a bit more power, only you can decide.
rmcomprandy- Posts: 1885
Join date: 2008-12-02
Location: Roseville, Michigan

Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
Well, money is part of it. I mean why spend money on a manifold when it could be put somewhere else. I originally asked if the Cobra Jet Stealth I have would work or if a standard Stealth or Performer RPM would work better? Are the ports too big on the CJ Stealth to maintain any kind of port velocity in a usable street rpm range or would it be fine with the rest of my engine? If the CJ manifold I have won't work well then I will sell it and get something that will or trade it for something that will.
Steve
Steve
velcro7279- Posts: 8
Join date: 2011-02-21
Location: Grayling, MI
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
The CJ stealth is to big and will hurt low end, the perfromer RPM is a great choice like has already been said.

dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR

- Posts: 6749
Join date: 2009-07-09
Location: Everywhere
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
remember usuable power = $$$$$. no matter how you look at it it is going to cost you to do it right.
not trying to be a smart ass but why would you put a stock iron manifold on a set of ported heads? sort of defeats the purpose to me.
not trying to be a smart ass but why would you put a stock iron manifold on a set of ported heads? sort of defeats the purpose to me.
paulie- Posts: 79
Join date: 2009-09-12
Age: 43
Location: NW Indiana
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
paulie wrote:remember usuable power = $$$$$. no matter how you look at it it is going to cost you to do it right.
not trying to be a smart ass but why would you put a stock iron manifold on a set of ported heads? sort of defeats the purpose to me.
Factory Stuff will out do or equal alot of aftermarket manifolds Idle to 3500-4000 RPM.

dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR

- Posts: 6749
Join date: 2009-07-09
Location: Everywhere
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
paulie wrote:remember usuable power = $$$$$. no matter how you look at it it is going to cost you to do it right.
not trying to be a smart ass but why would you put a stock iron manifold on a set of ported heads? sort of defeats the purpose to me.
BECAUSE ... the question is about dollars spent per performance gained NOT the most horsepower which can be achieved.
It totally depends upon how much someone is willing to spend for 10 ft/lbs of torque or horsepower at an RPM range he will rarely use; no one else can make THAT decision for him.
rmcomprandy- Posts: 1885
Join date: 2008-12-02
Location: Roseville, Michigan

I think I know what I will do.
Thanks for all the input. Think I will look around for a Performer RPM or 8012 Stealth and sell my 8021 Stealth. If anybody needs an 8021 Stealth I have one for sale now. Whenever I get this going I will let you know how it runs. Probably won't be for about three months though. After the weather breaks and gets a little warmer. Thanks again. Especially to dfree383 and Randy.
Steve
Steve
velcro7279- Posts: 8
Join date: 2011-02-21
Location: Grayling, MI
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
I didn't realize that a factory intake performed that well. I know in the past with the mopar and chevy stuff I have done, the factory intake was a weak link.dfree383 wrote:paulie wrote:remember usuable power = $$$$$. no matter how you look at it it is going to cost you to do it right.
not trying to be a smart ass but why would you put a stock iron manifold on a set of ported heads? sort of defeats the purpose to me.
Factory Stuff will out do or equal alot of aftermarket manifolds Idle to 3500-4000 RPM.
paulie- Posts: 79
Join date: 2009-09-12
Age: 43
Location: NW Indiana
Re: Stealth CJ or Standard Stealth?
again I wasn't trying to stir the pot, but really trying to learn something here. I am sorry if it came across that way but I am all about saving a buck where I can. I see in a abobe post that the factory iron stuff works better than I expected, and I am very interested in this.rmcomprandy wrote:paulie wrote:remember usuable power = $$$$$. no matter how you look at it it is going to cost you to do it right.
not trying to be a smart ass but why would you put a stock iron manifold on a set of ported heads? sort of defeats the purpose to me.
BECAUSE ... the question is about dollars spent per performance gained NOT the most horsepower which can be achieved.
It totally depends upon how much someone is willing to spend for 10 ft/lbs of torque or horsepower at an RPM range he will rarely use; no one else can make THAT decision for him.
after re reading I do see I could have worded myself better and again not trying to come across as a ass but more just being curious.
paulie- Posts: 79
Join date: 2009-09-12
Age: 43
Location: NW Indiana
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum