body separation
Page 1 of 2 • Share •
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
body separation
what is body separation and is it a good or bad thing?

Larry Williams- Posts: 469
Join date: 2009-08-08
Age: 67
Location: Courtice Ontario
Re: body separation
It is suspension separation , it is caused by the instant center location in relation to weight distribution of the car. The balance of power and weight distribution of the car is set unless you move weight or change power level so we move the instant center to try and make the car work right. Some cars like a lot of separation and some don't it depends on the power, ic and weight distribution of the car.

KY JELLY- Posts: 1168
Join date: 2008-12-03
Re: body separation
Shock extension valving is another part of the picture that can also have an effect on the total amount of suspension separation happening at/during the initial hit. Depending on how "good" a set of rear shocks might be (age, total adjustment range, dampening capabilities) they can in effect "mask/change/override" (to some degree) the expected actions of a given I/C placement.
So a shock with the extension valving set really tight can in effect help make a relatively short/high (violent) I/C setting act less violent & calmer separating less at the initial hit than expected. And a looser shock extension setting can in effect help make a longer/lower (lazier) I/C placement hit harder & separate more than expected at the initial hit.
Thanks to modern highly adjustable shocks, racers have a biger adjustment window to work with these days. Some people like to use a violent I/C placement calmed back down with tight shock extension settings. Some like a lazy I/C placement that they "wake-up" with looser shock extension settings. And some choose a middle of the road setting for both I/C placement & shock settings. All three methods can be made to work good, it's really more of a personal preference/personal experience thing than anything.
Engine torque & I/C placement generates the given amount of leverage for separation, shock valving controls the speed (over a period of time) at which that leverage is applied/released. It's a balancing game.
So a shock with the extension valving set really tight can in effect help make a relatively short/high (violent) I/C setting act less violent & calmer separating less at the initial hit than expected. And a looser shock extension setting can in effect help make a longer/lower (lazier) I/C placement hit harder & separate more than expected at the initial hit.
Thanks to modern highly adjustable shocks, racers have a biger adjustment window to work with these days. Some people like to use a violent I/C placement calmed back down with tight shock extension settings. Some like a lazy I/C placement that they "wake-up" with looser shock extension settings. And some choose a middle of the road setting for both I/C placement & shock settings. All three methods can be made to work good, it's really more of a personal preference/personal experience thing than anything.
Engine torque & I/C placement generates the given amount of leverage for separation, shock valving controls the speed (over a period of time) at which that leverage is applied/released. It's a balancing game.

DILLIGASDAVE- Posts: 1176
Join date: 2009-08-07
Location: Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: body separation
so separation is the extension of the front struts on launch? is the compression of the rear also?

Larry Williams- Posts: 469
Join date: 2009-08-08
Age: 67
Location: Courtice Ontario
Re: body separation
Larry Williams wrote:so separation is the extension of the front struts on launch? is the compression of the rear also?
No,
Body/suspension separation refers to the very first action (initial hit) the rear housing/rims takes, separating away from the chassis & planting the sidewalls down into the track surface. This first inital action might be very big (leafspring car) or very, very small (Pro Mod type car).

DILLIGASDAVE- Posts: 1176
Join date: 2009-08-07
Location: Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: body separation
Seperation is the extension of the rear shocks. The fronts should always extend on launch. The rears can extend, compress or barely move at all at the hit. Just depend on the set-up.
Dave, you treed me!
Dave, you treed me!

BigDave65- Posts: 445
Join date: 2009-08-12
Age: 46
Location: Cliffside, NC
Re: body separation
wouldn't a lot of rear compression unload the tires?

Larry Williams- Posts: 469
Join date: 2009-08-08
Age: 67
Location: Courtice Ontario
Re: body separation
BigDave65 wrote:......Dave, you treed me!![]()
On a side note, the squatting rear suspension action during the recovery period some cars exhibit (after the first initial hit separation action) is sometimes not actually really the rear suspension it's self "squatting" (moving back up-into the car). Sometimes it's actually just the rims getting closer & closer to the track surface (and the body just following along) as the sidewall is wound-up tight. But viewed at full speed the human eye/brain can't tell the difference between the two. Only video slowed down lets you get a good look at the difference between sidewall squat vs suspension squat.
A data logger is the ultimate tool to see exactly how much total rear suspension separation and squat (or neither) might actually be happening at the shocks. Slo-mo video is great, but it can't compare to actual data taken at the shocks.
Last edited by DILLIGASDAVE on July 25th 2011, 7:33 pm; edited 1 time in total

DILLIGASDAVE- Posts: 1176
Join date: 2009-08-07
Location: Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: body separation
Larry Williams wrote:wouldn't a lot of rear compression unload the tires?
It really all depends on the total combo.
During the recovery period of the launch where the rear shocks are more likely to see some compression, a stiffer compression setting might help the already planted sidewall/tread surface stay planted longer. But on the other hand a stiffer compression setting might also unload the slicks too much on a wheelie bar car.
A stiffer rear compression setting might also hurt down track by making the slicks spin a little as they "skip over" bumps in the track instead of allowing them to follow the track surface more closely.

DILLIGASDAVE- Posts: 1176
Join date: 2009-08-07
Location: Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: body separation
Slo-Mo video is your friend when chassis tuning. I used to spend hours watching vids of my own and other cars. You see things that scare you sometimes
. I can't seem to get anyone to film nowdays.

BigDave65- Posts: 445
Join date: 2009-08-12
Age: 46
Location: Cliffside, NC
Re: body separation
i'd like "whitelightning"from the other forum to read this,he'd shit,then tell all you what it realy is and how f***ed up your cars are.

cool40- BBF CONTRIBUTOR

- Posts: 3275
Join date: 2009-08-31
Age: 41
Location: south of music city
Re: body separation
Cool40 maybe you should put a link to this thread over there!

lghting94- Posts: 518
Join date: 2008-12-16
Location: Vine Grove Kentucky
Re: body separation
cool40 wrote:i'd like "whitelightning"from the other forum to read this,he'd shit,then tell all you what it realy is and how f***ed up your cars are.![]()
I just visited that thread. I missed it when it started. All I can say is WOW! I hope no one followed his advice. I quote "Body deperation is bad!"

BigDave65- Posts: 445
Join date: 2009-08-12
Age: 46
Location: Cliffside, NC
Re: body separation
by god!lghting94 wrote:Cool40 maybe you should put a link to this thread over there!

cool40- BBF CONTRIBUTOR

- Posts: 3275
Join date: 2009-08-31
Age: 41
Location: south of music city
Re: body separation
now we can share! http://www.460ford.com/forum/showthread.php?p=983373&posted=1#post983373

cool40- BBF CONTRIBUTOR

- Posts: 3275
Join date: 2009-08-31
Age: 41
Location: south of music city
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2 
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum