BIG BLOCK FORD
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Tube chassis question

+6
richter69
jones
cool40
DILLIGASDAVE
whatbumper
Shawn Sexton
10 posters

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Tube chassis question

Post  Shawn Sexton May 25th 2010, 11:11 am

Didn't want to hijack anyone else's thread, but had a question on how you notch tubing the right way, correct angle etc.

Just don't want to get into the situation where I "Cut it twice and it's still too short"

I see all kinds of obtuse angle in the tubing and how do you go about detemining this?

I probably opened a can of worms now!
Shawn Sexton
Shawn Sexton

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-10-07
Age : 64

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  whatbumper May 25th 2010, 11:50 am

I use a digital angle finder and just do some simple math comparing angles from the bars. and I use the following tool with a cordless dewalt drill and a cordless milwaukee angle grinder to notch.
Tube chassis question Tn10010
Tube chassis question 43699_10

whatbumper

Posts : 3024
Join date : 2009-11-11
Age : 43

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  DILLIGASDAVE May 25th 2010, 5:47 pm

X2 on the digital angle finder because it's amazing how far off some of the cheap bob-weight/pointer angle finders from Homedepot/Lowes/etc can be. Sometimes it almost gets comical when working with a bob-weight/pointer angle finder. You place it on the tubing & wait forever for the weighted pointer to stop swinging back & forth. Then you 'thump" it a few times to help it set on an angle. But with every thump it lands on a slightly different number. "Thump", 25 degrees......"Thump", 24 1/2 degrees......."Thump", 25 1/4 degrees........"Thump", 26 degrees. But the digital angle finders, very stable & repeatable (even the cheap ones). Place it on the tube repeatedly and BINGO.....24.70 degrees every time.

I never have liked any of the holesaw notchers because they do have a limit on the max angle you can notch. I just notch/fish mouth tubing the old school way, 14" chop saw to rough cut the notch, 8" bench grinder to finish the notch, belt sander to smooth any sharp edges & put a decent 45* edge for heat penetration on thicker wall tubing. Other tools I use associated with fitting a piece of tubing are an orbital sander, sandpaper, & Scotchbrite to remove any outer surface scale at the weld joint. And of course a drill & 1/16" bit to drill at least one pressure relief hole in each section of tubing.

As for using cordless tools in the shop, I gave up on them long ago. Too much of a hassle trying to keep at least one battery charged in reserve. And when a battery takes a siht, the replacement batteries cost too much. Cordless tools are fine for keeping in the trailer's tool box & use at the track. But they suck for every day repeated heavy shop use.
DILLIGASDAVE
DILLIGASDAVE

Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  cool40 May 25th 2010, 10:19 pm

x2 on the cordless stuff for everyday.i got a saw for cutting on the cars i fix and it takes 2 batteries to cut a unibody car in half.it's the shit for goen out in the yard and cutting off parts though. Smile have you saw the vid on yellow bullet of the guy notching with a chop saw? he's almost too good. Laughing
cool40
cool40
BBF CONTRIBUTOR
BBF CONTRIBUTOR

Posts : 7308
Join date : 2009-08-31
Age : 53
Location : on the 1/8 mile dyno

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  jones May 25th 2010, 10:56 pm

I agree!!!

whatbumper you must be crazy quick, patient or just down right good to do that work with rechargeable tools!! Laughing

jones

Posts : 2230
Join date : 2008-12-02
Location : Philadelphia, MS.

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  whatbumper May 25th 2010, 11:58 pm

jones wrote:I agree!!!

whatbumper you must be crazy quick, patient or just down right good to do that work with rechargeable tools!! Laughing

Milwaukee tools are the best I have found.(A set of power tools came with a new Chevy pickup that my uncle bought) I got tired of tripping over the damn cords all the time. As long as you keep an extra battery on the charger it is not that bad. We've built a couple 25.5 fox mustangs this way and each time it gets easier. I don't work by myself. One cuts and notches with the tubing notcher and the the other finishes the notches with the grinder.

I do have a cord on my chop saw though. Very Happy

This is NOT a perfect system. The other person is my brother and we exchange our share of curse words but I wouldn't want to work with anyone else. His vision and ability to problem solve are second to none. He has to being a full-time farmer that takes care of over ten thousand acres in a thress man operation.

whatbumper

Posts : 3024
Join date : 2009-11-11
Age : 43

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  richter69 May 26th 2010, 12:27 am

I use the cordless impacts at work.....my 1/2 deal started getting weak....I'm a cheap ass and broke out the airgun as i was not gonna spend 100 bucks to get it rebuilt and another 90 on a battery.

2 weeks later I sent the damn thing back in..................sure missed it lol.

I have a notcher made by protools, made a fixture to put it in my drill press..............that tool along with a plasma cutter are worth their weight in gold.
richter69
richter69

Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty thanks for the input

Post  Shawn Sexton May 26th 2010, 6:31 am

Thanks for all the input- I eventually want to rebuild my chassis, it's currently a 2x3 w/~.078 wall frame, ladder bar suspension, the cage is 1.75 x .125 wall that was stick welded back in the late 80s when that tubing was legal, or at least that's what I thought. I know stick welding is a no no, so I purchased a good 220v, 180 amp mig welder and am going to set that up to practice on some tubing. I used a friends similar welder and was amazed at how easy it is to lay down a decent bead, as long as you have the machine set up right.

Future plans are to get a tubing bender, but not sure what shoes to get. I know I'll need one for the 1 5/8 tubing , but not sure what radius bend is best. Any other sizes to get as a suggestion?

I did find this site for using a tubing bender and how to bend tubing

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/pdf_documents/bendinginstructions.pdf

I like the idea of using the digital angle finder that sure sounds like it makes the job faster and precise.

I have a drill press w/tilt table/degree pointer, but need some ideas for a tubing fixture on the table.

Looks like there's going to be a lot more research before I can get started.

Ultimately, I think I'll wind up just cutting everthing out and starting over with a round tube, modern design chassis.

Get ready to spend the $$!!
Shawn Sexton
Shawn Sexton

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-10-07
Age : 64

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  jones May 26th 2010, 9:07 am

Nothing wrong with stick welding as long as you know how to weld! I know a lot of welders that can lay down a stronger, prettier weld with a cracker jack box than the best mig.

jones

Posts : 2230
Join date : 2008-12-02
Location : Philadelphia, MS.

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Shawn Sexton May 26th 2010, 9:26 am

jones wrote:Nothing wrong with stick welding as long as you know how to weld! I know a lot of welders that can lay down a stronger, prettier weld with a cracker jack box than the best mig.

I agree, the guy that welded my chassis back then was a talented buzzbox welder. I don't think stick welding will pass chassis cert though, is this correct?

I have an old craftsman Ac/DC welder that I bought at a garage sale for $50.00, but can't make a good weld with it, too much slag inclusion with a 7018, 6010, or 6011. Someone once told me the welder may have a bad rectifier, whio knows?

I like to think its the machine and not the operator!
Shawn Sexton
Shawn Sexton

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-10-07
Age : 64

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  jones May 26th 2010, 9:32 am

Our welders use sticks and alot of their welds have to pass x-ray. I see no reason how or why a good weld wouldn't pass tech. (Not cracker jack boxes though)

I think it has more to do with the operator than the machine. I could be wrong, I'm not 100% on SFI, NHRA and IHRA spec's.

Edit: I am probably wrong so just ignore me. The small size of chassis tubing might be hard to control heat in.

jones

Posts : 2230
Join date : 2008-12-02
Location : Philadelphia, MS.

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  the Coug May 26th 2010, 10:07 am

Josh I think I remember the rule book saying you can use a mig or tig no stick....
Dave will respond when he see's this I am sure....


Randy
the Coug
the Coug

Posts : 3055
Join date : 2008-12-02

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Northwest outlaw May 26th 2010, 10:21 am

the Coug wrote:Josh I think I remember the rule book saying you can use a mig or tig no stick....
Dave will respond when he see's this I am sure....


Randy

Thats is right Randy mig/tig only It has to do with a few things heat in the tube and contaminates in the weld pubdle.
Northwest outlaw
Northwest outlaw

Posts : 962
Join date : 2009-06-27
Age : 48
Location : Pinehurst Idaho

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  whatbumper May 26th 2010, 11:25 am

after going TIG I will not use anything else on cages. once you get past the PITA attitude (I know I had it bad when I started) TIG is not that bad but of course all my stuff is CM. MIG is pretty useful though and on a MS cage it is pretty easy. In MIG welding the metal does not have to be as clean as TIG.

whatbumper

Posts : 3024
Join date : 2009-11-11
Age : 43

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  DILLIGASDAVE May 26th 2010, 6:38 pm

Yea, stick & Ox/Acc gas welding is a no-no for NHRA/IHRA/SFI stuff. Wire welding mild steel is fine (if done correctly) if that is what you have to work with & don't have access to a Tig. Use only solid Mig wire & gas (no flux core wire).

One mistake that some people make when fitting mild steel tubing for Mig welding is they actually fit the joint too tight (especially the .134" wall stuff) making it much harder to get the proper weld heat penetration with the Mig. An ultra super tight fitting weld joint is really only necessary when Tig welding .058" or .065" wall 'moly tubing. The .083" wall 'moly is also fit on the tight side, but with a slight 45* chamfer on the edge. With the .134" wall ms stuff & Mig welding you either fit the tubes touching each other at the joint, but with a decent sized 45* chamfered edge. Or you don't use any chamfer on the edge, but leave an air gap at the joint.

Proper tack weld placement also plays a part in Mig welding penetration & effects the weld joint strength. Before you grab the Mig & go crazy tack welding a fitted joint, look at the joint for a second. Figure out ahead of time how many start/stop passes it will take to go all the way around the tube & which direction each start/stop pass will go. Since Mig welding is so damn cold at the start of the pass, the idea is to place a tack weld where the weld pass will end/finish....and never (if possible) at the start of a pass. This helps "burn" the tack into the puddle because everything is up to full temp by the end of the pass. Starting a weld pass right on top of a tack weld further increases the chance of a "cold" puddle start & less weld heat penetration.

The same weld pass starting/stopping placement idea applies to beginning a new Mig weld pass in reference to previous weld passes. You want to end a new pass stopping at/on an older pass. But (again if possible) you try to avoid starting a new pass at/on an older pass (the "cold" start thinking again).

Tack welds are also a great "oops" fixer if you happen fit part of a weld joint way too loose leaving a gap too big in the weld joint. Just place a tack or two "in" the weld joint gap (vs "on" the weld joint). The tack(s) in the too loose joint will act as extra filler material & cool the weld puddle slightly as you pass over it helping to avoid a burn through.
DILLIGASDAVE
DILLIGASDAVE

Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Shawn Sexton May 27th 2010, 9:05 am

Just found some online software to help out with tubing notching-

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/framebuild.htm

Scroll down to software and look at Tubemiter.exe, this is an easy to use program for free, you can print out a paper pattern to overlay on the tubig for cuts.

thought this was a great keeper!
Shawn Sexton
Shawn Sexton

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-10-07
Age : 64

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  DILLIGASDAVE May 27th 2010, 8:35 pm

Shawn Sexton wrote:I did find this site for using a tubing bender and how to bend tubing

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/pdf_documents/bendinginstructions.pdf

Man that Pro Tools bender is almost an exact rip off of the JD Squared equipment. Even the Pro Tools PDF drawings look like they just copy/pasted JD2's info. Maybe they are actually the same company these days.....stranger things have happened.

A few years ago when I bought a new die/shoe size for my bender the JD2 salesman was telling me how an "unnamed company" had been trying to copy the JD2 design for a while, but they just couldn't get it exactly the same. The "copy-cat" company kept missing an important little angle change on the shoe that JD2 discovered helped make the bend form a lot smoother with less wall collapse on the outside of the bend.
DILLIGASDAVE
DILLIGASDAVE

Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Northwest outlaw May 28th 2010, 1:33 am

I like love my jd2 #32 killer bender.
Northwest outlaw
Northwest outlaw

Posts : 962
Join date : 2009-06-27
Age : 48
Location : Pinehurst Idaho

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  '65 T-BOLT May 28th 2010, 4:22 pm

I have the one that Speedway sells, its a great bender...the only thing that i do not like is the large radius!
'65 T-BOLT
'65 T-BOLT

Posts : 1464
Join date : 2009-08-28
Age : 53
Location : Hagerstown,Maryland

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  DILLIGASDAVE May 28th 2010, 4:56 pm

I guess the "stand up" Speedway design fills a need since not everyone likes to work the tubing with the bender laying flat.

Only things I don't like about the Speedway design is the die is made of aluminum. And they use a single roller wheel as the "shoe" to support the outer tube wall during bending vs a longer two surface slider shoe JD2 uses.

If I remember correctly my 1-5/8" die has a 6.5" radius, but i could be wrong. I don't remember the radius of the other dies, I would have too look. However the radius of the 1" die (whatever it is) is the perfect size for making 180* driveshaft loops. If your Speedway bender does have a rather large radius it's not really a bad thing. A large bending radius spreads the load over a larger area & is probably how they are able to use aluminum for the die.
DILLIGASDAVE
DILLIGASDAVE

Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  '65 T-BOLT May 30th 2010, 1:46 am

my speedway 1 5/8" shoe is a 7" radius and the 1" and 1 1/4" is on a 5" radius. we have not used it for a complete cage, but it does bend a nice 90* bend
'65 T-BOLT
'65 T-BOLT

Posts : 1464
Join date : 2009-08-28
Age : 53
Location : Hagerstown,Maryland

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Shawn Sexton June 4th 2010, 10:18 am

I guess the bigger the bend radius, the thicker the material stays to original on the outside of the bend.

JD has 6.5 and 5.5 radius shoes.

Hummm.... More research
Shawn Sexton
Shawn Sexton

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-10-07
Age : 64

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  '65 T-BOLT June 4th 2010, 3:52 pm

thinking back...wish I would have went with the JD2 bender
'65 T-BOLT
'65 T-BOLT

Posts : 1464
Join date : 2009-08-28
Age : 53
Location : Hagerstown,Maryland

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Shawn Sexton June 5th 2010, 5:08 pm

I'm considering the model 32, at $100 more for the base machine think it's worth it

Now, 5.5 radius or 6.5 radius 90 degree shoe for 1 5/8" tubing? or is a 180 degree shoe the way to go?
Shawn Sexton
Shawn Sexton

Posts : 52
Join date : 2009-10-07
Age : 64

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Dave Maxwell June 5th 2010, 6:02 pm

I have a hossfeld bender that I am happy with. It is a larger unit, and definitely alot more expensive than most. Got it at an auction though.

Dave Maxwell

Posts : 576
Join date : 2009-08-13
Age : 54
Location : Kickapoo Il.

Back to top Go down

Tube chassis question Empty Re: Tube chassis question

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum