High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  richter69 on September 22nd 2010, 5:47 pm

Ky brings up some points in my thread on the other site, I didn't start this topic to be a dick (for a change), but rather for general information. I'm not talking about 10-1 pump gas crap, but rather 14-17 to one "race" compression and how its achieved...........and how is one type of piston shape better than the other? And at what point is too much for a specific application.

No blowers, no nitrous, no turbo's, I'm talking n/a and even lean more toward an alcohol point of view.

richter69

Posts: 8199
Join date: 2008-12-02
Age: 41
Location: warmin' up my pimp hand

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Curt on September 22nd 2010, 6:03 pm

IMHO, the flatter the piston, the better the flame travel. Sometimes a dome is necessary to get the compresson up (like a bunch on a chevy Mad ).
Compression is free horsepower, but everything has it limits.

Curt

Posts: 1680
Join date: 2009-02-08
Age: 49
Location: Henrietta, Texas but mostly on the road

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Lem Evans on September 22nd 2010, 6:25 pm

"an alcohol point of view"
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
That's all you guys have tongue

Lem Evans

Posts: 4073
Join date: 2008-12-03
Location: Livermore , Ky

View user profile http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  jbozzelle on September 22nd 2010, 6:58 pm

I would try to achieve it with a flat top first only because the dome will affect flame propagation...

jbozzelle

Posts: 2174
Join date: 2009-08-10
Age: 37
Location: New Orleans

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Lem Evans on September 22nd 2010, 7:04 pm

a dome works good......just not to the point it gets "ugly".

Lem Evans

Posts: 4073
Join date: 2008-12-03
Location: Livermore , Ky

View user profile http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  DanH on September 22nd 2010, 7:15 pm

all will work , domes with the right shape give up little if not nothing . depends what head , imo I rather have a dome with A460 heads , then cutting the head for a 65/70 cc chamber . boils down to - do what you have to , just don;t give something else up by doing it

DanH

Posts: 604
Join date: 2009-08-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  bruno on September 22nd 2010, 7:17 pm

Great subject Jon ... did some reading Smile

Wedge engines like three things because of their port geometry and valve arrangement. These are:

First, a tight chamber on the exhaust side to reduce flow on the side entering to the bottom of the port. Too much flow here cuts off overall port flow because inertia causes this flow to swing toward the top of the port which then blocks the flow trying to enter the port from the center of the cylinder.

Second, is intake swirl. This is enhanced when the cylinder wall side of the chamber swings in a mild parabolic shape from the side of the valve toward the spark plug. An open chamber allows the flow to slow too quickly and swirl is lost.

Third, is spark plug location. The most effective location is near the center of the cylinder favoring the exhaust valve. This reduces burn time since the burn radiates in all directions from a central point rather than starting in one corner and progressing the entire bore distance. The exhaust valve is the hottest item in the combustion chamber and is a known source of preignition or a cause for detonation. By moving the spark plug close to that point, the burn is initiated there and this provides better control since ignition or explosion caused by the hot valve doesn't happen when it's already covered with burnt products. Of course we're not talking mich time the difference between old and lazy heads and modern fastburn chambers is a hand full of milli-seconds. But what a difference those few milli-seconds makes.

OK, I'm getting to dish versus flat tops versus domes.

Remember I mentioned squish and quench, these are functions of that flat side of the combustion chamber. Both of these functions are aided by as close a closure of the piston's deck to the head's deck as is possible to achieve within mechanical limitations.

First in the compression cycle squish happens as these two sections close on each other. This drives the mixture in this area back into the chamber by the spark plug with great force. The resulting turbulence and high density makes for a fast and complete burn when the plug ignites it. This reduces the amount of timing lead which reduces early forces in the combustion process that want to drive the piston back the way it came, which results in power lost. It also delays peak cylinder pressure and temperature to a moment when the piston is headed down the bore in the proper direction. This effect is to reduce the tendency to detonate.

The second event after ignition is that the close proximity of the piston and head decks perform what's called "quench". This is where the hot end-burn gases that like to detonate are trapped between two relatively cool surfaces with a lot of area compared to the volume. This sucks a lot of heat out and prevents detonation.

A third feature of modern heads is the beak that protrudes from the squish/quench deck between the valves. This helps prevent incoming mixture from being sucked thru the exhaust during the cam's overlap phase. The result is a denser mixture upon compression and more power and efficiency. Of course this dampens out the rough idle of a big cam. But it trades the rumpty rump idle for more power, better fuel economy and lower emissions.

Now if you have a flat top piston with a .040 inch clearance on the squish/quench side, the effects of squish and quench are maximized by how close the piston and head deck close with each other. The effect is the same with a "D" dish piston where the dish is all under the valve pocket. However, a piston with a circular dish cannot close any more than the raised rim of the piston crown. So even if this crown is .040 inch away from the head's squish/quench deck the floor of the dish is a considerable distance away and it cannot and does not expel the mixture toward the plug with sufficient force upon compression to throughly agitate the mixture for the most effective burn. At the post ignition point, it does not provide the high surface area to volume ratio of a flat top so that the late burn's excessively high temps are not damped. Both of these conditions lead to reduced power as on the squish phase the burn is slower and weaker requiring more timing lead which has the effect of first trying to drive the piston backwards and second increases cylinder pressure and temperature too early which combined with inadequate quench leads to detonation and preignition.

The problem with a domed piston is that it slows the burn speed by both reducing mixture agitation toward the spark plug and causes the burn to have to travel over and around it. The response to this is to add more timing lead and to run excessively rich mixtures to use evaporation of the fuel to cool the burn under the detonation limit. The optimum end game becomes one of finding the best chamber size against the dome size that results in the most power. Efficiency and emissions not being a consideration at these elevated compression ratios over about 10 to 1.


_________________
THXS TO ALL MY SPONSORS
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.evansracingengines.com
JET BOAT BOB
DAN " THE STICKER MAN " HOBBS ...AKA >>>> 56TBIRD

bruno
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 7792
Join date: 2008-12-02
Age: 39
Location: MILLBROOK , AL.

View user profile http://WWW.CKRME.COM

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Curt on September 22nd 2010, 7:21 pm



Here is a nice dome


Curt

Posts: 1680
Join date: 2009-02-08
Age: 49
Location: Henrietta, Texas but mostly on the road

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Curt on September 22nd 2010, 7:24 pm

Nice research Nick Smile

Curt

Posts: 1680
Join date: 2009-02-08
Age: 49
Location: Henrietta, Texas but mostly on the road

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  DanH on September 22nd 2010, 7:31 pm

"the problem with dome pistond" will say it again -- thats way BB Chevys can't make power and are the slowest thing on the track . they got them big ass dome pi`stons

DanH

Posts: 604
Join date: 2009-08-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  KY JELLY on September 22nd 2010, 7:49 pm

The 466 school bus motor has big well designed domes, ran the same with a 6 al and blaster coil as it did with a 7 al 2 plus so I think that would rule out the flame propagation thing. It ran a 5.51 in my car and that's nothing to sneeze at. for a little engine Very Happy

KY JELLY

Posts: 1168
Join date: 2008-12-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  richter69 on September 22nd 2010, 8:49 pm

Very Happy


Last edited by richter69 on September 23rd 2010, 5:44 pm; edited 1 time in total

richter69

Posts: 8199
Join date: 2008-12-02
Age: 41
Location: warmin' up my pimp hand

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Lem Evans on September 22nd 2010, 9:11 pm

bruno wrote:Great subject Jon ... did some reading Smile

Wedge engines like three things because of their port geometry and valve arrangement. These are:

First, a tight chamber on the exhaust side to reduce flow on the side entering to the bottom of the port. Too much flow here cuts off overall port flow because inertia causes this flow to swing toward the top of the port which then blocks the flow trying to enter the port from the center of the cylinder.

Second, is intake swirl. This is enhanced when the cylinder wall side of the chamber swings in a mild parabolic shape from the side of the valve toward the spark plug. An open chamber allows the flow to slow too quickly and swirl is lost.

Third, is spark plug location. The most effective location is near the center of the cylinder favoring the exhaust valve. This reduces burn time since the burn radiates in all directions from a central point rather than starting in one corner and progressing the entire bore distance. The exhaust valve is the hottest item in the combustion chamber and is a known source of preignition or a cause for detonation. By moving the spark plug close to that point, the burn is initiated there and this provides better control since ignition or explosion caused by the hot valve doesn't happen when it's already covered with burnt products. Of course we're not talking mich time the difference between old and lazy heads and modern fastburn chambers is a hand full of milli-seconds. But what a difference those few milli-seconds makes.

OK, I'm getting to dish versus flat tops versus domes.

Remember I mentioned squish and quench, these are functions of that flat side of the combustion chamber. Both of these functions are aided by as close a closure of the piston's deck to the head's deck as is possible to achieve within mechanical limitations.

First in the compression cycle squish happens as these two sections close on each other. This drives the mixture in this area back into the chamber by the spark plug with great force. The resulting turbulence and high density makes for a fast and complete burn when the plug ignites it. This reduces the amount of timing lead which reduces early forces in the combustion process that want to drive the piston back the way it came, which results in power lost. It also delays peak cylinder pressure and temperature to a moment when the piston is headed down the bore in the proper direction. This effect is to reduce the tendency to detonate.

The second event after ignition is that the close proximity of the piston and head decks perform what's called "quench". This is where the hot end-burn gases that like to detonate are trapped between two relatively cool surfaces with a lot of area compared to the volume. This sucks a lot of heat out and prevents detonation.

A third feature of modern heads is the beak that protrudes from the squish/quench deck between the valves. This helps prevent incoming mixture from being sucked thru the exhaust during the cam's overlap phase. The result is a denser mixture upon compression and more power and efficiency. Of course this dampens out the rough idle of a big cam. But it trades the rumpty rump idle for more power, better fuel economy and lower emissions.

Now if you have a flat top piston with a .040 inch clearance on the squish/quench side, the effects of squish and quench are maximized by how close the piston and head deck close with each other. The effect is the same with a "D" dish piston where the dish is all under the valve pocket. However, a piston with a circular dish cannot close any more than the raised rim of the piston crown. So even if this crown is .040 inch away from the head's squish/quench deck the floor of the dish is a considerable distance away and it cannot and does not expel the mixture toward the plug with sufficient force upon compression to throughly agitate the mixture for the most effective burn. At the post ignition point, it does not provide the high surface area to volume ratio of a flat top so that the late burn's excessively high temps are not damped. Both of these conditions lead to reduced power as on the squish phase the burn is slower and weaker requiring more timing lead which has the effect of first trying to drive the piston backwards and second increases cylinder pressure and temperature too early which combined with inadequate quench leads to detonation and preignition.

The problem with a domed piston is that it slows the burn speed by both reducing mixture agitation toward the spark plug and causes the burn to have to travel over and around it. The response to this is to add more timing lead and to run excessively rich mixtures to use evaporation of the fuel to cool the burn under the detonation limit. The optimum end game becomes one of finding the best chamber size against the dome size that results in the most power. Efficiency and emissions not being a consideration at these elevated compression ratios over about 10 to 1.


I'd think you should get a copy of the 2010 BBF Winter Tech Seminar and review Darin Morgan's talk before you copy/paste .

Lem Evans

Posts: 4073
Join date: 2008-12-03
Location: Livermore , Ky

View user profile http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Curt on September 22nd 2010, 9:19 pm

Come on Lem, let us have some fun with our old flat top love affair. I like them in the brands of Diamond and Gibson.




Curt

Posts: 1680
Join date: 2009-02-08
Age: 49
Location: Henrietta, Texas but mostly on the road

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: High compression topic, dish vs flat top vs dome.

Post  Lem Evans on September 22nd 2010, 9:25 pm

Three options.......small dome, flat top or dish. None of which includes milling a head excessively.

Lem Evans

Posts: 4073
Join date: 2008-12-03
Location: Livermore , Ky

View user profile http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum