BIG BLOCK FORD
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

which is better?

4 posters

Go down

which is better? Empty which is better?

Post  Larry Williams September 16th 2010, 10:20 pm

which diameter tire is the better front tire for drag racing ? a small diameter or a large one?
Larry Williams
Larry Williams

Posts : 884
Join date : 2009-08-08
Age : 79
Location : Wallacetown Ontario

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  richter69 September 16th 2010, 10:32 pm

the one with a "W" on the sidewall........... Wink
richter69
richter69

Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  Larry Williams September 16th 2010, 11:25 pm

richter69 wrote:the one with a "W" on the sidewall........... Wink

lol don't the big tires go on the back?
Larry Williams
Larry Williams

Posts : 884
Join date : 2009-08-08
Age : 79
Location : Wallacetown Ontario

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  DILLIGASDAVE September 17th 2010, 6:41 am

It all depends on the application.

If we are talking about reaction time vs front tire OD vs the staging beams.........

Sometimes if you have a car that could easily go real red without even really trying to squeeze the tree, you can fudge the reaction time a little slower by either going to a bigger OD front tire, or staggering the wheelbase side-to-side, so the staging beams see a bigger surface area.

Or if you want to fudge the RT a little faster, going to a smaller OD front tire (and/or having no wheelbase stagger) will sometimes do the trick by reducing the surface area the staging beams see.
DILLIGASDAVE
DILLIGASDAVE

Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  Larry Williams September 17th 2010, 7:39 am

thanks dave thats the info I needed. I have a 26" tall tire now but need to improve my reaction times on a .400 pro tree. Guess I will try a smaller tire.
Larry Williams
Larry Williams

Posts : 884
Join date : 2009-08-08
Age : 79
Location : Wallacetown Ontario

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  BigDave65 September 17th 2010, 11:50 am

Make sure you don't have any stagger in the front end. I don't know what kind of car you have, but most older race cars were built with the front wheels staggered.
BigDave65
BigDave65

Posts : 567
Join date : 2009-08-12
Age : 58
Location : Cliffside, NC

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  richter69 September 17th 2010, 12:13 pm

I missed the front part lol.

I did some switching with the front tire diameter and concluded getting the suspension and rear tire situation under control was more important.
richter69
richter69

Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  Larry Williams September 17th 2010, 1:42 pm

BigDave65 wrote:Make sure you don't have any stagger in the front end. I don't know what kind of car you have, but most older race cars were built with the front wheels staggered.

I have an '88 mustang notch any stagger is by accident, or smelling alcohol fumes lol
Larry Williams
Larry Williams

Posts : 884
Join date : 2009-08-08
Age : 79
Location : Wallacetown Ontario

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  DILLIGASDAVE September 18th 2010, 11:27 am

BigDave65 wrote:..............but most older race cars were built with the front wheels staggered.

That pretty much depended on the application back then, and today. There's really nothing wrong with running some wheelbase stagger if a given car's combo can use it, or needs it.

You see a lot of wheelbase stagger on the Pro Mods (and similar cars) that are using a clutch and/or where no delay box is used/allowed on a .400 pro tree. Some have well over 1" of wb stagger.

But on the other hand, you don't really see a bunch of wb stagger on the P/M's & Top Sportsman cars that are running a torque converter (such as a Lencodrive, or Bruno/Lenco, or 'glide) and a delay box is used/allowed on a .400 pro tree. On these cars there's really no reason to use any wb stagger since the delay box should be able to adjust out any red lights.


I know on one guy's 4.70 TS/Quick 8 car I worked on (that didn't use a delay box), having stagger vs no stagger was the difference between the driver having to be super careful & wait a split second after the flash of yellow to not red light without the stagger, vs him being more consistent & comfortable in the car allowing him to squeeze the tree a little if he wanted to with some stagger in the car. It just depends on the application if stagger would be useful or not.

On a side note you definitely don't want to confuse the average walmart, pep boys (or etc, etc) alignment shop by getting them to align a race car with wb stagger built in........could be a bad idea in waiting to happen in most cases. Rolling Eyes Laughing

DILLIGASDAVE
DILLIGASDAVE

Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"

Back to top Go down

which is better? Empty Re: which is better?

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum