rocker ratio

View previous topic View next topic Go down

rocker ratio

Post  bigblockpaul on Sat 28 Jan 2012 - 12:03

Does anyone use the 1.8 ratio on the exhaust and the 17.3 on the intake anymore.I have read about it but havent heard much on the results?

bigblockpaul

Posts: 40
Join date: 2009-08-29
Location: inver grove heights mn

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: rocker ratio

Post  Paul Kane on Sat 28 Jan 2012 - 12:36

bigblockpaul wrote:Does anyone use the 1.8 ratio on the exhaust and the 17.3 on the intake anymore.I have read about it but havent heard much on the results?
You can play with rocker arm ratios on a dyno (for example) and thereby alter valve timing events to see what the engine likes. If you find that a 1.73I/1.80E rocker arm arrangement makes better power than other I/E rocker arm combos, then there's nothing necessariily wrong with running that setup as opposed to making a cam change that would result in the same timing events as the rocker arm arrangement that gets you there.

Paul

Paul Kane

Posts: 321
Join date: 2009-09-14
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

View user profile http://www.highflowdynamics.com

Back to top Go down

Re: rocker ratio

Post  rmcomprandy on Sat 28 Jan 2012 - 12:42

bigblockpaul wrote:Does anyone use the 1.8 ratio on the exhaust and the 17.3 on the intake anymore.I have read about it but havent heard much on the results?


As Paul said, using different ratio rocker arms on the intake OR exhaust side in order improve performance is a normal thing. With a big block Ford, a stud mount rocker, about 1.9/1 is about the max; any more ratio and the pushrod cup in the rocker gets to close to the fulcrum. Over 2/1 rocker ratio is used with many valve trains using shaft mounted rocker arms.

rmcomprandy

Posts: 1882
Join date: 2008-12-02
Location: Roseville, Michigan

View user profile http://www.rmcompetition.com

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum