OK.. Have at it!!! NWS , Enter at your own risk!!!

Thats the best. made me smile.

schmitty wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

schmitty wrote:lieing about what's been done to his car or engine is a whole different venue.

Hold on here. What have I lied about pertaining to my car and/or my engine(s)?

What haven't you lied about, would take a lot less time.     

Honestly, I'm curious. Examples please. Size of the motor? Amount of spray? Internals? Heads? Tire size? I'm digging here....  

yellowhorse7 wrote:

605FOX wrote: ive sat back and watch these douche bags contribute shit to these forums !!!  fucking cum dumpsters !!

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

a caveman can do that in a 2300 lb stang ....duh !!! shit ask Les   

bruno wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

605FOX wrote: ive sat back and watch these douche bags contribute shit to these forums !!!  fucking cum dumpsters !!

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

a caveman can do that in a 2300 lb stang ....duh !!! shit ask Les   

Hell Lerch maybe you ask Lesser to come here and give this please some LIFE  

res0rli9 wrote:

bruno wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

605FOX wrote: ive sat back and watch these douche bags contribute shit to these forums !!!  fucking cum dumpsters !!

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

a caveman can do that in a 2300 lb stang ....duh !!! shit ask Les   

Hell Lerch maybe you ask Lesser to come here and give this please some LIFE  

Done

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDfZGPqxs5g

Masterpiece

bruno wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

605FOX wrote: ive sat back and watch these douche bags contribute shit to these forums !!!  fucking cum dumpsters !!

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

a caveman can do that in a 2300 lb stang ....duh !!! shit ask Les   

Guess so   

yellowhorse7 wrote:

schmitty wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

schmitty wrote:lieing about what's been done to his car or engine is a whole different venue.

Hold on here. What have I lied about pertaining to my car and/or my engine(s)?

What haven't you lied about, would take a lot less time.     

Honestly, I'm curious. Examples please. Size of the motor? Amount of spray? Internals? Heads? Tire size? I'm digging here....  

Here is one example: it's just a little DOVE head deal with a little porting. Truth was that those heads had over 100 hours of porting and port reshaping....    Mr. Politician

bruno wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

605FOX wrote: ive sat back and watch these douche bags contribute shit to these forums !!!  fucking cum dumpsters !!

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

a caveman can do that in a 2300 lb stang ....duh !!! shit ask Les   

Ya know, it's timely that you said this. I was actually considering starting a thread giving out basic SS info, hoping that it may help some guys. Shock Tech, Spring Stuff, what to do when XXX happens, etc. But now, I've thought twice.

schmitty wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

schmitty wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

schmitty wrote:lieing about what's been done to his car or engine is a whole different venue.

Hold on here. What have I lied about pertaining to my car and/or my engine(s)?

What haven't you lied about, would take a lot less time.     

Honestly, I'm curious. Examples please. Size of the motor? Amount of spray? Internals? Heads? Tire size? I'm digging here....  

Here is one example: it's just a little DOVE head deal with a little porting.  Truth was that those heads had over 100 hours of porting and port reshaping....     Mr. Politician

100 hours is a bit excessive. I do things big. My little porting means something different than someone else's little porting

Tony, I for one would welcome such a thread and any help and info would be much appreciated    

I'm just sitting here reading all this thread and realized it's in the open forum with really bad language where anyone can see it. Why isn't this in the Bar and Grill.   

Bruno have you lost your mind?  

Blake,it started in the p51 thread and the mods made a new thread to let it Bleed out.

bbf-falcon wrote:Blake,it started in the p51 thread and the mods made a new thread to let it Bleed out.

Exactly.... That's why the title is what it is... "Enter at your own risk"...

As soon as it is played out, we'll make it history.

That's a great idea.  

schmitty wrote:As soon as it is played out, we'll make it history.  

LOL  I think it's been well past that point...

Everybody has heard exactly what they expected....  

Mike R wrote:Tony, I for one would welcome such a thread and any help and info would be much appreciated    

Not gonna do it. But I will be glad to help your program anyway that I can via PM, phone calls or emails.

QtrWarrior wrote:

schmitty wrote:As soon as it is played out, we'll make it history.  

LOL  I think it's been well past that point...

Everybody has heard exactly what they expected....  

I will be the gentleman and let Mr. Politician and my cupcake have the last words and leave it there for a fair amount of time.

yellowhorse7 wrote:

Mike R wrote:Tony, I for one would welcome such a thread and any help and info would be much appreciated    

Not gonna do it. But I will be glad to help your program anyway that I can via PM, phone calls or emails.

If you want to do something like that, I will make sure you don't get jacked with on it.

schmitty wrote:

QtrWarrior wrote:

schmitty wrote:As soon as it is played out, we'll make it history.  

LOL  I think it's been well past that point...

Everybody has heard exactly what they expected....  

I will be the gentleman and let Mr. Politician and my cupcake have the last words and leave it there for a fair amount of time.

Feel free to do what youd like. Its fizzled at this point. Continue on. It doent matter whats said . Its middle of winter anyway. See eberyone in the spring.

yellowhorse7 wrote:

Mike R wrote:Tony, I for one would welcome such a thread and any help and info would be much appreciated    

Not gonna do it. But I will be glad to help your program anyway that I can via PM, phone calls or emails.

i wouldn't figure a grudge racer giving out info for all to see.   

QtrWarrior wrote:

schmitty wrote:As soon as it is played out, we'll make it history.  

LOL  I think it's been well past that point...

Everybody has heard exactly what they expected....  

Or what they wanted to hear.....

yellowhorse7 wrote:

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

Not to knock on you at all Tony so don't take it that way, but I had the rear shocks in my hands that came off this car that you speak of .......... They were the worst set of shocks that I had ever felt. You could not pull them apart nor push them together without any springs . The car had to be like trying to hook on a rigid suspension. It really had no chance at all of working knowing the power it is capable of making and on a finicky radial to boot. Glad it came around for him and he did not have to wear the car out chasing an easy suspension issue.

mary mary had a little lamb

TravisRice wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

I have a mailbox full of PM's, a slew of emails and a hand full of SS cars here in FL with my sticker on it that would prove otherwise. In fact, I just received a PM from someone letting me know that my suggestions helped. Paraphrased below....

"I did what you suggested and put all new spring's and shocks on. Track was green but prepped. It was only 58 deg. and very little sun.  Car hooked much better. It ran x.xx at xxx mph with a 1.2x 60 foot.no spray. It repeated this with no problem.
I know this is not ground breaking but the car went down a junk track when it wouldn't go down a decent track before."

Not to knock on you at all Tony so don't take it that way, but I had the rear shocks in my hands that came off this car that you speak of .......... They were the worst set of shocks that I had ever felt. You could not pull them apart nor push them together without any springs . The car had to be like trying to hook on a rigid suspension. It really had no chance at all of working knowing the power it is capable of making and on a finicky radial to boot. Glad it came around for him and he did not have to wear the car out chasing an easy suspension issue.

Okay?? I'm Confused. What are you saying? The new shocks worked or didn't?

***Never mind, I get it. Your saying it was an obvious fix.