Blake da' Snake is Flying at Beech Bend

IDT-572 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:The N.O.S. big shot plate with a proper 175 hp tune up will drive a rockin' BBF engine crazy.....which you have.

I ran it on a 351 c with the 175 tune and it drove it crazy................. picked up 1.4 seconds put it down in the low sixes.

cool40 wrote:

IDT-572 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:The N.O.S. big shot plate with a proper 175 hp tune up will drive a rockin' BBF engine crazy.....which you have.

I ran it on a 351 c with the 175 tune and it drove it crazy................. picked up 1.4 seconds put it down in the low sixes.

it takes more jug for a big boy!

Lem Evans wrote:

cool40 wrote:

IDT-572 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:The N.O.S. big shot plate with a proper 175 hp tune up will drive a rockin' BBF engine crazy.....which you have.

I ran it on a 351 c with the 175 tune and it drove it crazy................. picked up 1.4 seconds put it down in the low sixes.

it takes more jug for a big boy!

Wrong......spray is a tq. maker. Which small blacks do not have. BBF need less spray than a SBF to rock on....be tru

richter69 wrote:

56Tbird wrote:

richter69 wrote:I will add that is in the "mineshaft" air and a very well prepped track........but not to take away from it.

I'd kill for air like that, never happen around here though.

If you really believe that BS about the air being that much better up here,you'd be hauling that 3000lb. race car up here tomorrow.I don't think the air will make up for your Mr. Frosty.Blake will melt the Snowballs off Mr. Frosty

Ive been a .48 at 126.83 in 2500'da.......n/a In negative da I'm pretty sure it would be faster..............n/a


Since your so interested in comparing numbers bring that plastic fantastic out here and I'll show you the back of my rusty heap...............no mr frosty, no M5............I'll even leave all the weight in it it currently has so you cant make any excuses on why you got outran.....................No time shot, no dial in, unload it it and lets roll.................400 pro tree first one there wins.


I'm happy for Blake, he's worked his ass off.

Lem Evans wrote:My bad.........gas BBF don't need much spray.

cool40 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:My bad.........gas BBF don't need much spray.

gas is the only way to go with spray.........see we do agree

Lem Evans wrote:

cool40 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:My bad.........gas BBF don't need much spray.

gas is the only way to go with spray.........see we do agree

Yes I agree........Blake would have run 1.112 60' if he had methanol no doubt.

cool40 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:

cool40 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:My bad.........gas BBF don't need much spray.

gas is the only way to go with spray.........see we do agree

Yes I agree........Blake would have run 1.112 60' if he had methanol no doubt.

1.10 at best.

Lem Evans wrote:

cool40 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:

cool40 wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:My bad.........gas BBF don't need much spray.

gas is the only way to go with spray.........see we do agree

Yes I agree........Blake would have run 1.112 60' if he had methanol no doubt.

1.10 at best.

Only if he had a large building ........with wide doors.

56Tbird wrote:

richter69 wrote:

56Tbird wrote:

richter69 wrote:I will add that is in the "mineshaft" air and a very well prepped track........but not to take away from it.

I'd kill for air like that, never happen around here though.

If you really believe that BS about the air being that much better up here,you'd be hauling that 3000lb. race car up here tomorrow.I don't think the air will make up for your Mr. Frosty.Blake will melt the Snowballs off Mr. Frosty

Ive been a .48 at 126.83 in 2500'da.......n/a In negative da I'm pretty sure it would be faster..............n/a


Since your so interested in comparing numbers bring that plastic fantastic out here and I'll show you the back of my rusty heap...............no mr frosty, no M5............I'll even leave all the weight in it it currently has so you cant make any excuses on why you got outran.....................No time shot, no dial in, unload it it and lets roll.................400 pro tree first one there wins.


I'm happy for Blake, he's worked his ass off.

I got a big surprise for you Flabiho...I won't need no baby bottle with it either...I'll shake that rust bucket to pieces when I turn this thing loose on you

IDT-572 wrote:

cool40 wrote:link to h'ville this weekend........... http://www.huntsvilledragway.com/news/Alabama-Versus-the-World.html

You goin Lee.....................?

56Tbird wrote:Here you Flabiho ,here's an old surprise for you [img][/img]

KY JELLY wrote:When you 2 azzhats quit arguing about who has the fastest phord I am cooking off a batch of Col Moore's end of the gardenining season mild sweat tomato mash ethanol to do some real on track testing this weekend it will be available for $23.99 per gallon

KY JELLY wrote:In all seriousness what everyone should be paying attention to in this thread is Blake has physically shown how important Helmholtz resonator tuning is to an intake manifold . Yes we are limited too what is out there as far as pieces we can buy , but Blake has went way beyond that and custom fabed/modified his own manifold and the results are showing even in his traction/wheelie prone application . Its not a mistake his engine is running like this because he planned this from the get go. He has done his homework and its payed off.

richter69 wrote:

KY JELLY wrote:In all seriousness what everyone should be paying attention to in this thread is Blake has physically shown how important Helmholtz resonator tuning is to an intake manifold . Yes we are limited too what is out there as far as pieces we can buy , but Blake has went way beyond that and custom fabed/modified his own manifold and the results are showing even in his traction/wheelie prone application . Its not a mistake his engine is running like this because he planned this from the get go. He has done his homework and its payed off.

I hear he may be working on another intake as we speak..................

KY JELLY wrote:In all seriousness what everyone should be paying attention to in this thread is Blake has physically shown how important Helmholtz resonator tuning is to an intake manifold . Yes we are limited too what is out there as far as pieces we can buy , but Blake has went way beyond that and custom fabed/modified his own manifold and the results are showing even in his traction/wheelie prone application . Its not a mistake his engine is running like this because he planned this from the get go. He has done his homework and its payed off.

KY JELLY wrote:

IDT-572 wrote:

cool40 wrote:link to h'ville this weekend........... http://www.huntsvilledragway.com/news/Alabama-Versus-the-World.html

You goin Lee.....................?

good job Blake
I would be willing to go try and bust up that 5.30 index , but that's a stiff entry fee for 2 g's

How fast are them promods down there ? We ran Louie through at 4.81 @141mph out of it at I57 last weekend with only 11% overdrive, 40 % over drive and a 200 shot he could probably be nasty .

Don't forget Fun Ford weekend oct 15 at Memphis brand new penhall surface .